Page 2 of 4

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 6:52 pm
by r32
[學術研究] 有埋相+拉到人點解證據不足? :D

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 7:02 pm
by Fuji
milo wrote:
bobby chu wrote:
alexchrome wrote:
conjai wrote:
alexchrome wrote:
conjai wrote: ;;) ;;) ;;)
:fuck: :fuck: :fuck: :fuck:
cckit呢排都活躍左 ;;) ;;)
靠佢地係嗰邊發表一下不同意見
:-@ :-@ :-@
晒九氣啦, 全部深藍
同佢哋講真係哂鳩撚屌氣 :fuck:

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 10:48 am
by alexchrome
r32 wrote: [學術研究] 有埋相+拉到人點解證據不足? :D
以後要三百六十度環迴拍片加影相先可以做證據 :-bd :-bd :-bd :-bd :-bd

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 2:55 pm
by DonDon
r32 wrote: [學術研究] 有埋相+拉到人點解證據不足? :D
相可以 edit,或角度問題, video 都有得 edit! 所以呢個世界,除左個官親眼見,所以案件都可以唔成立 :-bd

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 5:39 pm
by 韋信
仲未比人 Kill? :-\

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 9:07 pm
by v234567
認人帶口罩是堅的?

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:15 pm
by Evan
抝乜鬼吖,side gas,同嗰邊啲人完全冇討論空間 [-(

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 5:44 pm
by bobby chu
Evan wrote: 抝乜鬼吖,side gas,同嗰邊啲人完全冇討論空間 [-(
真係冇乜好講。。 :onion113: :onion113: :onion113:

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 5:53 pm
by trytrysin
唔係你哋提起, 無乜動機上去... :) :)

Re: Eddie Wan

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 5:57 pm
by bobby chu
trytrysin wrote: 唔係你哋提起, 無乜動機上去... :) :)
你嚟呢度都唔多啦。。Image