on099.com

milo wrote:

韋信 wrote:

nomed wrote: 其實合唔合法?
佢地沒的士牌wor

唔合法，但合法個位似乎仲危險

點解唔合法？

UBER本身是科技沒有合法不合法的問題

問題是車輛牌照問題.

我都有個邀請碼，你地有冇人愛？

etvug5t9ue

京. wrote: 我都有個邀請碼，你地有冇人愛？

貼出黎喇，呢處有好多 CD Rom，佢地都用得上。

藥皇 wrote:

milo wrote:

韋信 wrote:

nomed wrote: 其實合唔合法?
佢地沒的士牌wor

唔合法，但合法個位似乎仲危險

點解唔合法？

UBER本身是科技沒有合法不合法的問題

問題是車輛牌照問題.

今朝收音機有專題講，呢種句資源分享摸式，Airbnb 都係呢種。我朋友個仔依家喺巴拉圭交流緊，住緊人地屋企，嚴格黎講都唔係合法，因為對家並無有效旅館牌照。

韋信 wrote:

藥皇 wrote:

milo wrote:

韋信 wrote:

nomed wrote: 其實合唔合法?
佢地沒的士牌wor

唔合法，但合法個位似乎仲危險

點解唔合法？

UBER本身是科技沒有合法不合法的問題

問題是車輛牌照問題.

今朝收音機有專題講，呢種句資源分享摸式，Airbnb 都係呢種。我朋友個仔依家喺巴拉圭交流緊，住緊人地屋企，嚴格黎講都唔係合法，因為對家並無有效旅館牌照。

兩件事... 交流緊生計大前提對方並無收取你留宿既費用.

雖到我留朋友住幾天我要去拿旅館牌照?


In accordance with section 52(3) of the Road Traffic Ordinance, Cap 374

(3) No person shall-
(a) drive or use a motor vehicle; or
(b) suffer or permit a motor vehicle to be driven or used,
for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward unless- (Amended L.N. 100 of 1984)
(i) the vehicle is licensed as a public bus, public light bus or taxi;
(ii) the vehicle is licensed as a private bus and the passengers are students, teachers or employees of an
educational institution, disabled persons, or persons employed to assist disabled persons; (Amended 50 of
1999 s. 10)
(iia) the vehicle is licensed as a private light bus and is used-
(A) as a school private light bus; or
(B) exclusively for the carriage of persons who are disabled persons and persons assisting them; or
(Added 50 of 1999 s. 10)
(iii) a hire car permit is in force in respect of the vehicle.

http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf. ... 4_e_b5.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


(3) 任何人不得─
(a) 駕駛或使用汽車；或
(b) 容受或允許他人駕駛或使用汽車，
以作出租或取酬載客用途，除非─ (由1984年第100號法律公告修訂)
(i) 該車輛獲發公共巴士、公共小巴或的士牌照；
(ii) 該車輛獲發私家巴士牌照，而乘客為教育機構的學生、教員或僱員、傷殘人士、或受僱協助傷殘人士的人； (由1999年第50號第10條修訂)
(iia) 該車輛獲發私家小巴牌照，並—
(A) 用作學校私家小巴；或
(B) 只運載傷殘人士以及協助該等人士的人；或 (由1999年第50號第10條增補)
(iii) 該車輛領有生效的出租汽車許可證。