pantaron wrote:
Discobay wrote:
Raymond Wan wrote:
wmmokk wrote:Only if you need to encrypt your files, the Hardware Encryption function of DS214+ will be useful.
The Hardware Encryption Function is preferred for some of the sensitive data.
Hence, based on this and the above, I should select the DS214+.
Once again, thank you for your professional advice and bringing out the important points for me to consider.
Agreed, I read other place review seems play version faster as media server, and + version slower on media related work. However, your usage seems not related to media files, so agreed with the + version.
我最近都要setup一個nas 比3人workgroup upload report 同做個share folder
e個combo 真係唔錯又平，但3T RED怕唔怕會慢？
I am now using 3TB x 2 (RAID1) with HDD of WD Red / WD Black / WD RE for 3 units of NAS at my home.
They (QNAP & Synology 2-Bay NAS) are all working fine for speed and reliability.
WD Red - 3 Years Warranty
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=810" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
WD Black - 5 Years Warranty
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=760" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
WE RE (Enterprise) - 5 Years Warranty
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=580" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I believe if you want slightly higher performance, you may consider WD Red Pro
WD Red Pro - 5 Years Warranty
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=1280" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
However, with only 3 to 4 persons sharing the files, I do not think it is necessary.
WD Red designed for NAS (1-8 Bays) of home and small office and so it can certainly do the job.
WD Red Pro is designed for NAS (8-16 Bays) of Soho and medium to large office.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
